Intéressé ? Contactez-nous maintenant
Pour nous contacter, veuillez remplir le formulaire à droite ou nous envoyer directement un email à l'adresse ci-dessous
sales@senecaesg.com-->
As the EU prepares a Q4 revision of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), French investors remain split on ESG fund classification reforms—a debate that may reshape the bloc’s carbon neutral strategy and green finance credibility.
Asset managers like Amundi advocate for mandatory product categorization to combat greenwashing. Supported by the French Asset Management Association (AFG), Amundi proposes three ESG-driven fund categories: “sustainable,” “transition,” and “E, S, G,” aligned with the EU’s carbon neutrality goals. They also urge the EU Commission to clarify definitions and align with ESMA’s fund-naming guidance.
In contrast, BNP Paribas AM calls for simplified ESG criteria, warning that overly rigid definitions—especially those tied strictly to the EU Taxonomy—may hinder disclosure efficiency. The firm suggests a streamlined framework with minimal due diligence burdens, pushing for fewer reporting requirements to ease compliance.
Insurers are equally divided. Maif supports gradual transition and clear regulatory mapping, while Aéma Groupe emphasizes regulatory coherence to prevent greenwashing. Meanwhile, Crédit Agricole and La Banque Postale AM demand disclaimers for funds outside ESG categories to prevent misleading sustainability claims.
Caisse des Dépôts echoes this call, saying “unclassified products” should be flagged to discourage non-compliant ESG labeling. Groupe BPCE urges the EU to balance innovation with regulation by avoiding definitions that stifle performance or niche market growth.
Opponents of sweeping reforms—like AXA Group—warn that overhauling SFDR categories would waste resources with little added value. They favor targeted fixes over system-wide changes.
Overall, French stakeholders agree on the need for clarity and consistency. But the path forward—whether preserving Articles 6, 8, and 9 or adopting new ESG-aligned classifications—remains contested. The outcome will shape the EU’s ESG strategy, investment transparency, and carbon neutral ambitions.
Source :
Suivez les performances ESG dans les portefeuilles, créez vos propres cadres ESG et prenez de meilleures décisions commerciales éclairées.
Pour nous contacter, veuillez remplir le formulaire à droite ou nous envoyer directement un email à l'adresse ci-dessous
sales@senecaesg.com7 Straits View, Marina One East Tower, #05-01, Singapour 018936
+65 6223 8888
Gustav Mahlerplein 2 Amsterdam, Pays-Bas 1082 MA
(+31) 6 4817 3634
77 Dunhua South Road, 7F Section 2, Da'an District Taipei City, Taïwan 106414
(+886) 02 2706 2108
Viet Tower 1, Thai Ha, Dong Da Hanoi, Vietnam 100000
(+84) 936 075 490
Av Jorge Basadre Grohmann 607 San Isidro, Lima, Pérou 15073
(+51) 951 722 377
1-4-20 Nishikicho, Tachikawa City, Tokyo 190-0022