Interested? Contact us now
In order to contact us please fill the form on the right or directly email us at the address below
sales@senecaesg.com-->
In a significant shift, major oil companies are reevaluating their commitments to green energy amid mounting political and legal backlash against ESG initiatives, particularly in the United States. This growing anti-ESG movement, marked by hundreds of bills introduced across U.S. states and reinforced by recent federal policy rollbacks, has made low-carbon investments riskier and less financially appealing for traditional energy firms.
ExxonMobil, for instance, recently halted development on one of the world’s largest planned low-carbon hydrogen projects, citing weak federal incentives. Similarly, Shell canceled a hydrogen facility in Norway, while Equinor paused its blue hydrogen efforts due to the lack of market readiness.
BP is also stepping back from earlier climate commitments. The company is slowing its reduction in oil and gas investment, increasing spending on Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), and redirecting focus toward biofuels and hydrogen. It also exited a major green hydrogen project in Australia, signaling a cautious pivot away from higher-risk clean tech ventures.
This strategic retreat reflects more than just financial caution: it illustrates how political resistance to ESG is reshaping the energy transition timeline. The current environment has made it harder for companies to justify large-scale investments in low-carbon solutions, especially when incentives are uncertain and market demand is still developing.
While many oil majors still maintain long-term net-zero goals, they are increasingly prioritizing shorter-term projects with quicker returns and fewer regulatory complications. The shift suggests that until policy supports stabilize and market conditions mature, the pace of corporate investment in renewable energy and low-carbon technologies may continue to slow.
For sustainability advocates, the trend is concerning. It shows the need for consistent policy frameworks, stronger financial incentives, and broad public support to ensure that climate goals aren’t sidelined by political headwinds. Without these elements, the energy transition risks being delayed just as momentum is critically needed.
Source:
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Oil-Majors-Rethink-Green-Projects-Amid-Anti-ESG-Push.html
Monitor ESG performance in portfolios, create your own ESG frameworks, and make better informed business decisions.
In order to contact us please fill the form on the right or directly email us at the address below
sales@senecaesg.com7 Straits View, Marina One East Tower, #05-01, Singapore 018936
+65 6223 8888
Gustav Mahlerplein 2 Amsterdam, Netherlands 1082 MA
(+31) 6 4817 3634
77 Dunhua South Road, 7F Section 2, Da'an District Taipei City, Taiwan 106414
(+886) 02 2706 2108
Viet Tower 1, Thai Ha, Dong Da Hanoi, Vietnam 100000
(+84) 936 075 490
Av. Santo Toribio 143,
San Isidro, Lima, Peru, 15073
(+51) 951 722 377
1-4-20 Nishikicho, Tachikawa City, Tokyo 190-0022